Planting the Seeds of the 2011 Revolution

It may have been a bit slow in starting, but the New England Revolution offseason transformation (we hope it will eventually be qualified as such) has begun.   Today’s announcement that the team has waived Emmanuel Osei follows a week player movement and news.

The changes started with the addition of Didier Domi, an experienced, left-sided, French fullback that has played in many of the top European leagues.  We can talk about Domi’s addition, questioning everything from his age (we are replacing Gibbs, a 31 year old American left back, for Domi, a 31 year old French left back), his cost (not yet known) and his current playing level (the Greek league isn’t the EPL now is it?)… but he clearly has some pedigree if there is still gas in the tank and the right mentality to come in and compete.

Roster changes, however, must be thought of holistically since small rosters and tight salary caps mean every change causes ripples throughout a team.

With the addition of Domi there are some interesting roster implications that were highlighted the very next day when the Revolution announced the re-signing of Chris Tierney.  Tierney is most frequently used on the left side at both defense and midfield and we should suspect these two to battle for playing time, unless Tierney can make the left midfield slot his own.

These moves also suggest that Seth Sinovic, who Nicol seemed to lose faith in toward season’s end, is happy that there is a larger senior roster in 2011.

When it comes to the draft, I love hearing (fellow?) pundits grade how the Revs made out.   These grades are typically based on such little information that they are hard to take too seriously.  I don’t believe that I am prone lathering undo affection on Mr. Burns or Mr.  Nicol, but I’m not about to launch a stinging critique when I’ve not seen a single minute of soccer played by anyone we drafted.

And I doubt most of the graders have seen more than snippets either.

By the end of the 2010 campaign, it became fairly clear that the Revs needed help across quite a few positions.  There were too few threats at forward and too many worries in defense.  While midfield may not have been concern number one, a bit of offensive spark and a less predictable attack would be nice.

And since none of us know what prospects Nicol and Burns are chasing outside of the draft – and to keep Revs fans from going completely crazy, there better be some more news there – saying they picked too many or too few of any one position is a bit crass.

What I like about the Revolution draft strategy is that they led with a central defender.  Why?   It was clearly a need, and if there’s one position that Burns and Nicol should be able to both scout and grow, it’s that of a defender.   Nicol is a defensive legend, and say what you will about Burns but he played at the highest levels the USA has to offer.   And that’s more than anything we have on our back line today.

The Revolution certainly CAN succeed at drafting for other positions (see Clint Dempsey as the most obvious example of a non-defensive success), but I suspect those players are harder to find, and harder for our current leadership to nurture.  Maybe it is safer to go for experience there?

Some other quick thoughts on the recent moves…

  • Cleary we drafted for SuperLiga fights… I mean games. Or for the Chicago jihad… I mean rivalry.   Four of the five players are six foot plus.  I wonder if they will be paid in rolls of pennies…
  • With a name like Stephen McCarthy, could he really have gone anywhere BUT New England? 
  • If Steven Perry ends up making the roster, the Revolution will finally have someone to inherit the dusty hair product left behind by Darren Sawatzky.  Oh, c’mon… PerrySawatzky.
  • Speaking of the Stevens…  The Revolution have Steve Nicol, Stephen Myles, Stephen McCarthy and (potentially) Steven Perry playing or coaching.  Phew, with Steve Ralston’s departure I was afraid the team was running low on Steve’s.
  • Emmanuel Osei showed moments of real promise in terms of athleticism and skill, but each of those moments seemed more than balanced out by mistakes that frustrated and confounded coaches, fans and teammates alike.  (Even Brad Feldman had trouble explaining some of them away.)  In the end, there’s new blood coming in with Ryan Cochrane and A.J. Soares, and the lapses are too big of a liability be balanced out by a low salary.
  • The idea that the Revolution helped arrange for supporters to be at the draft and support the team is a very positive sign.  It suggests that 2011 might not be business as usual for the team front-office.  We’ll see…

So the Revolution has started the offseason changes and more are promised.  It’s hard for me to complain about any of these moves, as they all seem directionally positive.

But, the fans who heard the front-office whispers about a Designated Player hunt are all still waiting for something a bit bigger… not just taller.

Advertisements

3 thoughts on “Planting the Seeds of the 2011 Revolution

  1. Good thoughts as always! It’s certainly difficult to know how the draft choices will pan out until the season begins. As the 2010 season ended there were many questions going forward. The Revolution had/have many gaps in their line-up and needed to sure up a few spots.

    If we still think the Revolution will be bringing in a Designated Player, that will most likely be in the form of a forward of midfielder. That being said, if possible to draft a young defensive stud, let’s do it. The Revolution gave up a league high 50 goals last year. Granted there were some injuries, but with the release of Osei and the absence of Gibbs, we needed something. Having a backline of Alston, Barnes, Soares and Domi could be promising – again, we’ll have to see how good come the season.

    Having Shalrie as your midfield anchor isn’t a bad place to start on offense. I think Tierney stepped up last year, and wouldn’t mind seeing him on the left side. Nyassi and the second central midfielder role will be of question, but it does look like we have some size to work with. We could use a big target in the box after losing Twellman a few years back. There’s also Perovic, who paired up with the right person has shown he can produce and make things happen.

    In Steve Nicol We Trust!

  2. We live in hope. They seem to making all the right sounds, and finally making some moves (goodbye Khano!). They still need to make more noise to get any kind of attention (zero Revs coverage so far from their “broadcast partner” CSN New England), but I’m willing to give them the benefit of the doubt. Burns did say they would be “more active” in the transfer market in last year’s preseason and that didn’t happen, so less talk and more action please.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s